Reviewing contracts
When a document comes back with the other party’s changes, comparison finds every edit without relying on them having flagged it.
Compare two texts and highlight the differences.
🔒 This file is processed in your browser. It is never uploaded anywhere.
…
Comparing two texts shows exactly what changes between them: what was added, what was removed and what stayed the same. Done by eye it is very unreliable, because the brain tends to read what it expects to find and skips over small differences.
And small differences are precisely the ones that matter. A "not" that appears or vanishes, a changed figure, a different date. In a contract revised by the other side, or two versions of a document that have gone back and forth by email, finding that by reading in parallel is slow and unsafe.
The result marks additions in green and deletions struck through in red, the usual convention, letting you see the scale of the changes at a glance.
When a document comes back with the other party’s changes, comparison finds every edit without relying on them having flagged it.
Two drafts that have circulated by email are reconciled by seeing exactly where they differ.
Checking that a transcribed or copied text really matches the original.
It works with any text length, from a sentence to several paragraphs; longer texts simply take a little more time for your browser to process.
The comparison is linear, character by character, so a paragraph moved elsewhere will show as deleted at its original spot and added at the new one.